For other uses, see Elite (disambiguation)
Look up elite, élite in a Dictionary.Elite (also spelt Élite) is taken from the latin, eligere, "to elect". In sociology as in general usage, the élite (the "elect," from French) is a relatively small dominant group within a larger society, which enjoys a privileged status which is upheld by individuals of lower social status within the structure of a group. When applied to an individual, as in the phrase "many elites come to this restaurant," the usage quite economically both refers to an individual within that class and establishes the speaker as non-elite.
An elite is the result of economic and political forces within a social structure. Upon formation, societies have always had the tendency to stratify due to a combination of politics and ability. The position of an elite at the top of the social strata almost invariably puts it in a position of leadership and often subjects the holders of elite status to pressure to maintain their position as part of the elite. However, in spite of the pressures borne by its members, the existence of the elite as a social strata is usually unchanged.
1 Religious elite
2 Linguistic elite
3 Class elite
4 Educational elite
5 Financial elite
6 Military elite
7 Elitism
Religious elite
In religion the Latin form "elect" is preferred over the French form "elite" in discussing Cathar or Calvinist theology, for examples, and the social structure that is theologically driven. Other religious groups may use expressions like "the saints" to describe the elect.
Linguistic elite
Some elite groups speak a language that is not shared by the commonality: in Tsarist Russia and in Vietnam the elite spoke French, in Plantagenet England the elite spoke Anglo-Norman, and in Ptolemaic Egypt the elite spoke Koine Greek. (See linguistic imperialism.) Elites establish correct usage for the language when they share one with the commonality. Elite usage is reflected in "prescriptive" dictionaries; common usage is reflected in "descriptive" dictionaries. Elites establish cultural canons, which are more widely agreed-upon within the elite and more generally ignored or resented among the non-elite. In the 1950s, the British elite spoke what linguists of the time called U English.
Class elite
American style straw hat. Complex social rules can determine when an occasion is sufficiently informal so that a man may correctly wear this hat.Elite advantages are the usual ones of a dominant social class: easier access to capital and political power, more rigorous education largely free of indoctrination, resulting in cultural influence, and leadership.
Elites may justify their existence based on claims of inherited position; with the rise in authority of science, certain 19th and 20th century elites have embraced pseudoscientific justifications of genetic or racial superiority. In Nazi Germany, genetic superiority was used as the basis of an imagined "Aryan" elite. Elite classes headed by monarchies have traditionally employed religious sanctions for their position.
Meritocracy is a facet of society that tries to promote merit as a route to the elite. Societies such as that of the United States have it in their culture to promote such a facet [see Horatio Alger]. However, while it tends to be imperfect it sheds light as to what many believe to be the "ideal" elite: an elite that is porous and whose members have earned their position as society's top class.
Aristocracy and oligarchy are social systems which feature an elite as the ruling class. An elite group, ranged round the alpha male, is a distinct feature of other closely-related social primates.
Educational elite
Elites are educated to govern. While common public education is often designed to educate the general population to produce knowledgeable and skilled citizens, the elite approach to education is often presented at a more intellectual and demanding level, and is geared to produce leaders of a sort. It is generally defined at education geared at producing an individual capable of thinking at an intellectual level more advanced than the general population, consisting of diverse philosophical ideals and theories in order to enable the elite to logically evaluate situations.
Financial elite
Wealth is not a sure sign of elite status, as the "new rich" are frequently seen as arriving from non-elite positions. Neither does an elite necessarily show a sense of public obligation.
Military elite
A military elite is a military unit of soldiers or recruits picked for their competence and put in a special, elite unit. Elite units enjoy some benefits as compared to other units, at least in the form of higher status, but often also higher pay and better equipment. Napoléons Imperial Guard would be a good example. Note that the word elite in the military sense is fundamentally different from most other uses of the term. A social or societal elite has usually not been picked by anyone except themselves and do not necessarily make part of the elite due to their competence. Military elite units do not exercise any special leadership over other units. In the societal and social sense of the word, the elite of the army is the officer corps, not the elite units.
In the military community, it is considered doubtful if the creation of elite units are expected to do the same things as a regular military unit, only better, (as opposed to special forces that are expected to do other things than regular soldiers)is good resource manangement. Critics argue that it creates a negative "second class soldier"-feeling among the regular units. Furthermore they argue that an especially competent soldier does more good as an NCO or as just the guy who sets a good inspiring example for his comrades.
Historically many elite forces have been created and maintained as much for political reasons as for military ones. The leaders feel they need something more politically reliable than ordinary units and create elite units, hoping that the priviliges, the extra political indoctrination that such elite forces are typically given and the pride in belonging to an elite will make them more loyal. Typically, it works. Waffen-SS would be an obvious example.
Elitism
In elite theory as developed by Marxist political scientists like Michael Parenti, all sufficiently large social groups will have some kind of elite group within them that actively participates in the group's political dynamics. When a group is arbitrarily excluded from the larger society, such as in the case of the racism that was widespread in the United States prior to the success of the American Civil Rights Movement, then elite members of the excluded group may form a counter-elite to fight for their group's interests (although they may be fighting for those interests only to the extent they mesh with the counter-elite's interests). Of course, the dominant elite can neutralize the counter-elite through the classic divide-and-conquer strategy of admitting key members of the counter-elite into the elite.
Elitism usually draws envy and resentment from the lower classes and the counter-elite. There are cases where elites arguably use this resentment of an elite to maintain their position. See Communism. The Elite in the United States also use this method of control via popular culture and media influence. Author C. Wright Mills elaborates on this influence in his book The Power Elite.
Look these up (*_*)
Boston Brahmin
Brahmin
Elitism
Mandarin
Patrician
Snob
Leet
The cause of world unrest, poverty, wars, human rights attrocities and social depravation is?
Your question is one of the best I have read. My congratulations and thanks.
Man is the cause. No question about this.
But some men are more then others.
So we come to the elites.
For the bad and for the good.
Can you do anything to "improve", or change, our elites?
I believe democracy is changing our elites, but it is only the beginning.
As you know the Greeks, "invented" democracy, more then 2000 years ago.
Is it too long or too short?.
If we can find ways to improve the democratic system, the democratic ideal, the elites will, inevitable, different and better.
Reply:Imbecile. Report It
Reply:So ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The strong conquer the weak and make them slaves.
I thought we knew that already!!
Reply:Profit, exploitation, and the siege mentality.
Reply:Very impressive piece of article
Reply:Just blame the US, everyone else does.
Reply:Okay, how in the world did you get to use so many characters in your question? I thought everyone was limited to a 1000 characters.
Reply:US greed.
Reply:so be it,
if you can't beat-em, join-em!
Reply:I got as far as the third paragraph and got bored. This question had potential but turned out to be very very dull in execution.
In answer to the main question, human beings are the cause of all those things, and all those things may never go away from human society.
Reply:Where did u download all this from?
And If all your questions are going to be this long, u will be on Level 1 for ever.
Reply:Very good article, but I'm not equipped well enough to discuss this. So I'm just rating it thumbs up =)
Reply:Mankind....
and when you have finished reading all our answers could you please help one of my students with their doctorial thesis, because I have had enough!
Reply:Is it not foolish to term your thesis as a question ?
Reply:Could you not just shorten this up and say George Bush and his gang of idiots are the cause of all that is bad in this world.
Reply:I would have said poverty itself is a problem AND the root cause of all other world problems. How do we eliminate poverty?
By breaking down barriers. By allowing people to connect and share in the global market place. Not by building little walls around econonomies and societies.
Forget charity. The way to REALLY help the poor is to let them sell whatever unique comparitive advantage they possess.
Proverb: Give a man a fish and he has a meal for a day.
TEACH a man how to fish and he will never go hungry.
Reply:a conspiracy by people who are slaves of money and power and will anything to make it sustainable..
Reply:You know this is one of the best answers I've read, pity you forgot the question but at least you got all that off your chest.
Reply:What is your point?
Are you trying to make the ultimately simplistic assertion that elites are to blame for world unrest and poverty?
Reply:I prefer not to answer you lower class sods, it is beneath me.
Reply:Other people's greed. Also their procrastination. Did anybody read all this rubbish?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment